I spoke with Richard last night. He seemed exciting to help do some work on this. We're thinking about getting together sometime during the week of 4/6/15 to discuss more and possibly come-up with a plan of action. Anyone else interested?
Even in the best case, access will continue to be non-legit for at least a while. In order to keep this access "tolerated" for as long as possible, I'd like to suggest a few things that will, hopefully, keep official objections to a minimum. I'm not trying to dictate here; just want to offer some clear suggestions. Differing opinions are welcome; especially if brought up for discussion.
1) Parking Most objections brought up by police started with parking on or using the access road. It's very convenient to drop gear off on the access road, and then park in the lot. It's even more convenient to park on the access road and leave your vehicle there even while sailing. However, from the perspective of keeping access long-term, it's probably best to keep vehicles off the access road entirely (Someone had already recommended this in another thread). 4-way flashers while dropping stuff at the east end of the circle, and then parking in lot as soon as possible is probably okay. I'm open to other suggestions, but until then, let's try to set a good example and keep off the access road and encourage other WS to do so as well. Objections? It is a way to carry gear, especially if you don't know exactly what gear you'll need. Reid posted a gear cart that might be helpful under the equipment section for anyone who objects to the haul.
Interactions with Police Generally speaking, whenever confronted with Police (if you think you're under suspicion) it's best to say as little as possible. At least as far as keeping yourself out of trouble. As far as promoting access, it's theoretically possible that discussing our situation with police
might be productive, unfortunately, it's just as likely to go very poorly, even if you are polite. Police do have a difficult job. By the time they are confronting you because you're doing something questionable, it's probably too late to have a productive conversation about access. At this point, it's there job to collect evidence and testimony about the possible violation. Not to say that police act like robots, but only that they have a job to do. In fact, most Police are very good at this part of their job. You may think you're having a friendly discussion about improving lake-shore access, meanwhile the police are taking careful notes as you continue to incriminate yourself.
Discussing with police before you start to engage in questionable activities is also problematic. Doug posted some ideas about this, and I agree in a certain way. At the same time, you're also putting the police in a difficult position. (drawing attention to borderline sketchy-action about to occur and also asking them if "it's cool").
What's a problem, what's not Previous posts recommended a "get in, get out, disappear" approach. I don't think this is a bad idea; keep a low profile. At the same time, it's probably smart for everyone to have an understanding of the relevant laws, and realize that most windsurf activities are already totally legal. Just because you're in a wetsuit, doesn't mean you have to explain yourself. Understand the law and realize there are many scenarios that don't involve any infractions.
Whatever portion of the activity might be questionable, by all means, get it over with quickly.
Any other/ or different thoughts?